When it comes to SEO, creating different types of link strategies is important. Some can be aimed directly at search engines, others can be designed to appeal to a specific demographic with the hope that they will click through –guest blogging on a popular related site is one example.
Link marketing, has evolved into more of a PR function rather than a traditional SEO function. We’re moving away from creating links to manipulate rank and pursuing an unnatural strategy will ultimately leave your site in a bad place.
The devaluation of links isn’t something new, it began years ago as the popularity of SEO grew, and over time things that used to work now don’t. More recently, what was once a highly effective link building strategy – creating blog networks – has been eliminated by Google Panda. For further details, check out some of the background over here.
When developing your strategy, look at what search engines consider to be violations of quality within their guidelines. A lot of these may not be considered ‘illegal’, however they can also negatively impact your overall strategy and have the potential to bring great success or failure to your business. Keep your eyes open.
People and companies have adopted an SEO strategy where they launch a site, pay a hell of a lot of cash for link building tactics (both clean and dirty), and as long as the site would remain competitive in the rankings and as more venue was being generated from the site than the operational expenses, most people didn’t really care what sort of links were in place to affect Google search results.
Obviously this is a flawed approach and it’s certainly a gamble. Over time, websites would rank higher, eventually get killed off by Google and disappear, then people would simply create a new site and begin the process again.
The logic was that if you spend $25k to develop a website, build links and rank to where it would generate $40k in business revenue before the site was hit, then it made sense that this was a good business decision. Whenever something was killed off the process could begin again.
1) Create the site
2) Spam the site with links until top ranking was achieved
3) Make money from rankings until Google caught on
4) Repeat the process again
This can be difficult to argue, especially if a client has seen good financial success. There isn’t a single solution for every site, and an SEO and link building strategy will vary from large to smaller clients, but it’s all about identifying what the site needs and how you can achieve it. We’re at a point where a lot of sites are getting blown up by Panda updates, so “doing it right”, diversifying and leaning toward more natural link building is now more important than ever.
Organic and paid search are an important part of any Internet marketing strategy, however Google’s research on how the two work together has been questionable. In fact, Google has claimed that ceasing a paid search campaign would result in an 89% decline in clicks. It’s interesting that such a figure can be so significant, after all, what if a site is top ranking for a specific keyword? As you can imagine, a lot of questions were asked and Google’s most recent study presents new results that further explain the interaction between organic and paid search.
The majority of the time, for most sites, there are no organic results on page one. The 89% decrease in clicks makes a lot more sense given that 81% of paid search ads are displayed without an accompanying organic result, as an average. In fact, a search ad is only paired with a top ranking organic result 9% of the time. Organic results appear in positions 2 and 4 only 5% of the time, and rankings below 5 appear 4% of the time.
The researchers didn’t dig into keywords in much depth, analyzing branded vs. generic terms, however branded terms are likely to appear higher, which isn’t surprising.
So what if you’re already in a #1 organic position. Why the hell do you need to spend more money? Isn’t it a waste? You may be surprised to know that even if a brand is ranked in a #1 position, if a paid search ad is present, the site will receive 50% more clicks, on average. It may be hard to believe, but the data speaks for itself.
The study also showed that 82% of ad clicks are incremental if a site’s organic result is positioned between 2 and 4. Clicks are 96% incremental should a brand’s organic rank be 5 or below.
When looking at averages and considering the complexities of campaigns, there will be a far amount of variability within the data from keyword to keyword and advertiser to advertiser, which is why it’s important to do your own testing and measurement. Also of importance, the study used clicks for measurement, not tracking conversions, so we are unable to feel out what incremental clicks followed through to a defined conversion.
Is paid search a part of your Internet marketing stategy? If so, how are you using it? If not, does it interest you? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!
Just when you thought Google’s Panda was taking a rest, Google announced that there have been recent updates to the algorithm that targets low-quality web content.
Interestingly, Google has chosen to use Twitter for the latest announcement:
As mentioned in the tweet above, Google has estimated that roughly 1.6% of search queries will be affected by the latest Panda update.
While it’s unclear just how substantial the latest update really is, discussions within the Internet Marketing community have highlighted a big impact on interlinked blog networks in the early days.
If you’re unfamiliar with Panda, check out the infographic below, originally posted on Search Engine Land.
Has Panda had a negative impact on your SEO strategy? What are your plans for adaptation? Let us know in the comment section below!
There’s continuous talk and complaints about SEO, some claiming that it’s dead. SEO is dead. Just kidding. But aren’t you getting sick of hearing that? There are always claims that the latest Google update is going to destroy any sort of strategy that ever existed, but the people that push that sort of talk usually just want traffic to their blog post/an article illustrating the point.
People have even claimed that SEO doesn’t work. Oh. Well, it’s 2012 and we’re optimizing content for search engines. Sounds like SEO to me, and guess what? People even want help doing it. The reality is that SEO isn’t going to fade away into nothing, but it will evolve, just like any good piece of technology. Here’s why SEO isn’t going anywhere:
Google is still driving a serious amount of traffic through search. Therefore, a massive amount of money is at stake. Where there’s money, there will always be competition and a willingness to spend money to win.
SEO best practices aren’t intuitive (know rel=canonical? Explain it to someone who doesn’t know a thing about SEO). There will forever be a need for communicating best practices to those who don’t live in the SEO world. Rather than viewing search algorithm changes as a threat, view them as an opportunity. A company’s reliance on your knowledge will grow as search engines continue to change the rules. You’re an asset. Embrace it.
Developing strategies aimed at scaling keywords across an organization digital landscape will always be important. It’s also important to remember that keywords aren’t an SEO thing, they’re a marketing thing.
The first rule of communication is to speak to your audience in a language they can understand. Keyword research is really user research into how language is most often used by a prospective and present customer base relating to your content topics, services, and products. Hint: do not ignore this.
Activities related to SEO are also beneficial to the user experience:
The larger the company, the harder it is to do these things on a consistent, ongoing basis. It requires a focused effort, and requires a guiding hand that ensures activities are executed properly.
With search evolving and becoming fragmented into hyper niche channels, and as voice based searching becomes more prominent, there will always be a need to understand the technology behind the searches. Searching technology will always need to be able to find, process and interpret the data and information it’s looking for. These protocols will still need to be communicated to businesses and sites that want their information to be found.
It’s always important to understand the language that potential and present customers are using to find you, and for you to ensure that your keyword strategy scales across the entire digital landscape.
So, is SEO dead, dying, or stronger than ever?
With Google’s recent re-launch of social media based results, engineers from MySpace, Facebook and Twitter have created an open-source plugin as proof that Google is prioritizing its own Google+ results in search, moving away from the original mission of being a neutral directory of search on the Web.
The plugin alters Google’s new search results that showcase Google+, the goal of the plugin being to include social media from a variety of social networks such as Quora, Myspace, Foursquare, Flickr, Tumblr, Twitter and Facebook.
The tool doesn’t use any third party data or APIs, instead it uses Google’s own search algorithm to present social media links that are most relevant to the search query. These results are present in three positions where Google+ results are presently featured: the search auto-complete bar, the showcase box for “people and pages” and the search pages themselves. The plugin reworks the on-page elements, allowing you to conduct a Google search that will present true social media content.
Of course there are cases where Google+ profiles will still be the most relevant in search, but in the majority of cases older and more authoritative pages will be presented, such as a celebrity’s Facebook page or an established Twitter account.
As written on the plugin’s website, engineers are hoping that the tool proves that with the new “upgrade” Google has created to present results, more generic searchers for things such as music or movies are wrongly prioritizing Google+ results over content that is more relevant.
For example, if you do a search for “Facebook”, Google will return a link to Mark Zuckerberg’s empty Google+ profile. Probably not what people are looking for.
While the plugin is collaborative and is not an official product of MySpace, Twitter or Facebook, the engineers express views that mirror sentiments that were raised upon Google’s “Search, Plus Your World” launch – the feature that they claim has fractured the search ecosystem.
Twitter was the first to make a criticizing statement about the move. In response to criticism surrounding Search, Plus Your World, Google stated that they would be willing to work with social networks to allow a user’s social information to also be present in search results. However, Google has also said that they require business agreements in order to gain access to the networks in order to use the data – something that has been proved false through using Google’s own indexed data for the plugin. The plugin never goes outside of Google.com to gather information, including access to 3rd party servers or APIs. All information presented has already been indexed by Google.
Google made some huge changes to its algorithm back in 2011, the first aiming and targeting spamming/scraping sites, followed by the larger Panda update targeting low quality sites. Google even penalized big players, as well – Overstock.com, LCPenney and Forbes were all hit for “shady” backlinking practices.
What does this mean for link building? Well, forget about low quality link building altogether. Seriously.
If you’re a link builder this may take some time to digest, especially if you’re researching your competition for a particular keyword and see that they’re dominating due to their 20,000 spam links.
There are a couple of things you have to step back and consider when face to face with low quality, high volume links when doing an analysis:
Let’s be honest here. Do you want to be that SEO company that drops on the ball on the next LCPenney or Overstock off-page strategy?
How do you determine the value of a potential link on a site? Google has its own criteria to define a low-quality site, but here are a few “warning signs” that illustrate it:
So, enough of the negatives. What should you be focusing on? Well, surprise surprise – content!
Nine in ten organizations are using blogs, infographics, whitepapers, webinars, and other forms of high quality content to create leverage for link building aimed at attracting natural, organic links. This content doesn’t have to just be about building links, either. You can use it to build leads by proving that the business knows what they’re talking about when it comes to their industry.
With all the Panda attacks, news, algorithm changes and penalties, have you begun to shift your link building strategy? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comment section below!
Well friends, we have a Christmas gift for those looking to do a little extra citation building this season! BrightLocal has curated a list of the top 50 citation sources for businesses in both the US and UK.
BrightLocal launched a massive citation analysis project between the months of March and May this year.
The analysis targeted more than 480,000 Google Places listings and were segmented across 40 separate industries and 100 locations. This citation information was then pulled into a database of more than 1.1 million separate citation sources.
The massive list was then filtered for quality, removing junk brand and business sites, resulting in a refined list of 15,000 quality citation sources.
Some of these sites have very powerful citation opportunities and are spread throughout Google’s citation index as a result.
For reference, back in June 2011 Google made the decision to remove citation content from Google Places listings, resulting in the information being hidden from public view.
Make no mistake, even though citation domains are no longer visible in Google Places listings, they remain an integral part in local SEO ranking. Take a look at the chart below that illustrates the top 5 ranking factors from David Mihm’s Local Search Ranking Factors survey.
The 4th most important local SEO ranking factor is considered to be the Quantity of Citations.
The two tables below list the top 50 citation sources for US and UK targeting. Google removed citation data before data could be gathered for additional countries.
The Frequency Count is the number of times the domain was found on 480,000 Google Places listings analyzed. Many domains were found multiple times per Google Places listing.
For convenience, click here to download a full Excel copy of the citations sources listed above.
Merry Christmas everyone!
Google has announced a massive change to its search ranking algorithm, one that has affected roughly 35% of searches. To improve relevancy, Google is now making an effort to determine whether a query will should return a result that is more up-to-date, presenting “fresh” search results rather than more established but older links.
Google considers user intent. If you’re searching for something like “olympics”, you’re more than likely looking for information related to the upcoming 2012 Summer Olympics as opposed to older or more general information. Google search now has the intelligence to determine the appropriate result.
With the launch of Google+, posts are indexed and the network provides Google with real-time search data, signals that are needed to help determine both timeliness and relevance. Making changes to the search algorithm is one part of a bigger picture; social data adds a clearer picture of what’s happening throughout the Web now.
The recent updates are an extension of Google Caffeine, a search infrastructure that originally came online back in 2009. Caffeine fully launched in June 2010 resulting in “50% fresher results.” Google has refined “refreshness” by breaking content into three major categories:
Recent events or popular topics: things like breaking news, stories that may have been published within minutes.
Regularly recurring events: elections, sports games or conferences.
Frequently updated information: things such as product reviews.
Google is all about present useful, relevant results to users. As pictured above, Google’s goal is to drive us crazy. Just kidding. Search results are no longer about presenting a stack of information by rank, they want to use information and data to determine what results will be most relevant for each search query. This requires Google to index in real time. Caffeine has accomplished this from the crawling side, and Google is working hard to use publishing systems that are designed to alert the search index of new content much more quickly.
Social networks provide a ton of value for search, because users are doing the real-time publishing and alerting work on their own, making the indexing of that relevant content much easier for Google, Twitter and Facebook.
Google had originally partnered with Twitter back in 2009 to launch real-time search. Unfortunately for Google, the deal expired and Google was forced to shut down real-time search this past summer. It simply wasn’t of benefit to either party. Twitter has acquired search companies for its own development purposes, and Google has launched Google+, their own social network.
With Google+ posts now present in search results, Google is working with its own real-time search using the social network. Through the collection of social signals, Google will be able to improve the “freshness” of its search results by adding a human touch.
Have you tried doing a Google search to see timely results? Check it out and let us know what you think!
With an Internet Marketing strategy, it’s safe to assume that your business objectives are heavily dependent search engine rankings and traffic from other websites back to your own. When looking at search engine rankings (SEO) themselves, the number of quality links helps to bring you and keep you at the top. Aside from that, you need links from reputable sites to help increase your own site traffic. More>>
With analytics and measurement becoming increasingly more advanced, there are companies out there that offer products that allow you to legitimately predict how your traffic will respond to your site’s content. Adobe has recently launched a new service called SearchCenter+, and another company, Visual Revenue, offers features that also aim to help you better optimize your content and ad buys for your site. More>>